Accountability

Accountability

Accountability systems signal policy priorities, report performance, inform support strategies, and build public understanding of K-12 schools. We work with education leaders and constituents to design, implement, and evaluate accountability systems that support student learning and school improvement. To be effective and meet states’ and districts’ goals, these systems must be technically sound and responsive to local needs.


Recent Accountability Projects

Mississippi

The Center supports the design, implementation and evaluation of Mississippi’s accountability system by providing ongoing technical consultation and analyses. We also coordinate meetings of its accountability task force, an advisory group of state education leaders. Through this work, the Center can identify solutions that are responsive to the state’s policy priorities.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire leaders wanted to learn more about whether their accountability system was working as intended. For example, are school ratings reliable, valid, and useful? The Center designed and implemented a series of studies to investigate these questions and document the results to inform the state’s ongoing efforts to refine and improve its practices.

Kentucky

Kentucky wanted to establish standards for school quality that were clear and meaningful. The Center worked closely with state leaders to develop and implement an innovative methodology for setting school performance standards. Grounding the standards in a strong process and compelling rationale helps build trust and buy-in among state constituents and helps ensure the accountability results are more useful to support school improvement.


Recent Accountability Blog Posts and Papers

Using Longitudinal Designs With NCLB

This presentation, given at the 2003 Large Scale Assessment Conference, describes two ways that a longitudinal, value-added accountability system could […]
June 25, 2003

Determining the Reliability of School Scores

This paper provides details on how to compute the probability that schools will be correctly classified under various accountability models.
November 30, 2002

2002 Reidy Interactive Lecture Series

Implementing the NCLB Act: Alignment, Reliability, Rationality October 10th – 11th Agenda Session I Reliable Accountability Design Decisions and NCLB: […]
October 11, 2002

Local Assessment Systems That Improve Teaching and Satisfy State Accountability Requirements

This presentation summarizes the work done to develop a large group of assessment activities in English, math, science, and social […]
June 26, 2002

Initial Modeling of NCLB AYP

This presentation, given at the CCSSO 32nd Annual Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, gives an overview of the No Child Left […]
June 26, 2002

Designing Accountability Systems That Comply With NCLB

This presentation at the CCSSO Large-scale Assessment Conference examined the federal No Child Left Behind accountability requirements from the perspective […]
June 24, 2002

More Than Just A Number: Qualitative Systems in Accountability

This presentation at the 2002 CCSSO Large-scale assessment conference discusses how and why states may use methods other than a […]
June 23, 2002

Designing School Accountability Systems

This document presents an elaborated framework, a concise checklist, and examples to assist states and others in the design, modification, […]
January 1, 2002

2001 Reidy Interactive Lecture Series

Implementing an Accountability System that Improves Schools October 4th – 5th Agenda Session I Defining the Correct Criteria for “Quality” […]
October 5, 2001

School Accountability Systems: Framework and Examples

A presentation to the U.S. Department of Education, sponsored by Council of Chief State School Officers. It provides a framework […]
August 30, 2001