Accountability

Accountability

Accountability systems signal policy priorities, report performance, inform support strategies, and build public understanding of K-12 schools. We work with education leaders and constituents to design, implement, and evaluate accountability systems that support student learning and school improvement. To be effective and meet states’ and districts’ goals, these systems must be technically sound and responsive to local needs.


Recent Accountability Projects

Mississippi

The Center supports the design, implementation and evaluation of Mississippi’s accountability system by providing ongoing technical consultation and analyses. We also coordinate meetings of its accountability task force, an advisory group of state education leaders. Through this work, the Center can identify solutions that are responsive to the state’s policy priorities.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire leaders wanted to learn more about whether their accountability system was working as intended. For example, are school ratings reliable, valid, and useful? The Center designed and implemented a series of studies to investigate these questions and document the results to inform the state’s ongoing efforts to refine and improve its practices.

Kentucky

Kentucky wanted to establish standards for school quality that were clear and meaningful. The Center worked closely with state leaders to develop and implement an innovative methodology for setting school performance standards. Grounding the standards in a strong process and compelling rationale helps build trust and buy-in among state constituents and helps ensure the accountability results are more useful to support school improvement.


Recent Accountability Blog Posts and Papers

Supporting A Principled Approach to Restarting School Accountability in Spring 2022

Operational Best Practices for Accountability Recently, my colleague Chris Domaleski reminded us of the complexity associated with restarting school accountability […]
March 23, 2022

Comparisons Matter: Considering What Recovery Is

Now is the Time to Begin Preparing for the Reporting of Spring 2022 Assessment Results The question about the pandemic […]
February 23, 2022

A Principled Approach to Accountability in 2022

Four Principles to Guide State Decisions about ESSA Accountability Systems A large part of the work my colleagues and I […]
February 16, 2022

Accountability Doesn’t Need to Be Restarted. It Needs to Be Revised!

Making the Case for a New Approach to Federal School Accountability The U.S. Department of Education followed an all too […]
January 26, 2022

Charting a Course for School Accountability in 2022

Navigating Federal Requirements In the midst of the holiday season, the U.S. Department of Education (USED) released a draft FAQ addressing […]
January 20, 2022

Oh, What a Year…Again

Responding to Assessment and Accountability Challenges During an Ongoing Pandemic I titled my 2020 year-end CenterLine post, “Oh, What a […]
December 28, 2021

Through-Year Assessment: Technical & Logistical Issues

From Session 3 of the 2021 Convening on Through-Year Assessment: Technical and logistical issues associated with through-year designs are not […]
November 16, 2021

Through-Year Assessment: Claims, Designs, and Evidence

From Session 2 of the 2021 Convening on Through-Year Assessment: Claims are the foundation for design and validation. This session […]
November 15, 2021

Through-Year Assessment: Definitions, Aims, and Use Cases

From Session 1 of the 2021 Convening on Through-Year Assessment: Given the considerable variety of designs using the terms “through […]
November 15, 2021

What Works? State Accountability Indicators to Promote Validity, Equity, and Improvement

Presentation at the AERA Special Interest Group on School Indicators and Profiles; uses examples from several states to highlight the […]
November 7, 2021