Technical Issues

Technical Issues

Assessment and accountability systems must be technically sound to be useful in policymaking decisions that support school improvement. As skilled psychometricians, researchers, and evaluators, Center professionals provide expert advice on the validity, fairness, and reliability of those systems to ensure they operate as intended.


Recent Technical Issues Projects

Technical advisory committees

The Center coordinates TACs for 18 states and school districts, and serves on a total of 44 TACs. TACs provide expert and independent advice to help states design, implement, and evaluate their assessment and accountability systems.

Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

Cara Laitusis and Laura Hamilton serve on the committee that is revising the AERA, APA and NCME volume known as the “bible” of educational testing. These standards serve as the touchstone for technical quality for almost all state and district tests.

Student Growth Percentile model

Damian Betebenner continues to refine the SGP, which is used as the growth model in more than 30 states. Dr. Betebenner and his colleagues have been using the SGP model in more than a dozen states to help state leaders understand COVID-19 impact and recovery rates.


Recent Technical Issues Blog Posts and Papers

Incorporating Growth Models into AYP Determinations: NCME 2006 Growth Pre-session Materials

This workshop, associated with the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) 2006 meeting in San Francisco, was designed to […]
April 5, 2006

Using Value Tables to Explicitly Value Growth

A presentation, given at the 2005 MARCES Conference on Longitudinal Modeling of Student Achievement, that outlines issues associated with using […]
November 7, 2005

Effect of Minimum Cell Sizes and Confidence Interval Sizes for Special Education Subgroups

Reports modeling results for several states of the effect of various sizes of minimum-n and confidence intervals on No Child […]
September 26, 2005

Minimum n and Confidence Intervals: Proficiency and Exclusion of Special Education Students

The effect of varying confidence interval size and minimum-n size for the special education subgroup on adequate-yearly-progress (AYP) determinations and […]
September 26, 2005

Documenting the Validity of Accountability Systems: A Progress Report

This presentation provides an approach for thinking about the validity of accountability systems, and provides several examples of how system […]
June 20, 2005

Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Adjusting AYP Workbooks to Increase Reliability & Validity

This presentation advocates several practical changes to increase reliability and validity of No Child Left Behind school accountability decisions, notably […]
April 14, 2005

Keeping the Baby and (Most of) the Bathwater: Mid-course Adjustments to NCLB’s AYP

This presentation, from NCME’s 2005 conference, describes several adjustments that could be made to increase the validity of adequate-yearly-progress (AYP) […]
April 12, 2005

No Child Left Behind: Grappling With “Adequate Yearly Progress”

Ten suggestions for improving accountability issues caused by the technical implementation of the adequate-yearly-progress (AYP) rules of No Child Left […]
November 18, 2004

Models for Using Student Growth Measures in School Accountability

This presentation examines design decisions policymakers should consider when deciding if and how to incorporate student growth or value-added models […]
November 15, 2004

2004 Reidy Interactive Lecture Series

Incorporating Measures of Student Growth Into State Accountability Systems October 7th – 8th Agenda Session I Validity Considerations When Measuring […]
October 8, 2004