Technical Issues

Technical Issues

Assessment and accountability systems must be technically sound to be useful in policymaking decisions that support school improvement. As skilled psychometricians, researchers, and evaluators, Center professionals provide expert advice on the validity, fairness, and reliability of those systems to ensure they operate as intended.


Recent Technical Issues Projects

Technical advisory committees

The Center coordinates TACs for 18 states and school districts, and serves on a total of 44 TACs. TACs provide expert and independent advice to help states design, implement, and evaluate their assessment and accountability systems.

Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

Cara Laitusis and Laura Hamilton serve on the committee that is revising the AERA, APA and NCME volume known as the “bible” of educational testing. These standards serve as the touchstone for technical quality for almost all state and district tests.

Student Growth Percentile model

Damian Betebenner continues to refine the SGP, which is used as the growth model in more than 30 states. Dr. Betebenner and his colleagues have been using the SGP model in more than a dozen states to help state leaders understand COVID-19 impact and recovery rates.


Recent Technical Issues Blog Posts and Papers

User-Friendly Documentation and Validation Processes (Part 1)

Supporting A Vision with Documented Strategy and Tactics Professionally and personally, we often have projects or tasks where we define […]
December 7, 2021

Collaboratively Learning About Through Year Assessments

It Will Take a Village to Fulfill the Opportunities of Through Year Assessment Systems “Through year” or “through course” assessment […]
November 30, 2021

Through-Year Assessment: Technical & Logistical Issues

From Session 3 of the 2021 Convening on Through-Year Assessment: Technical and logistical issues associated with through-year designs are not […]
November 16, 2021

Through-Year Assessment: Claims, Designs, and Evidence

From Session 2 of the 2021 Convening on Through-Year Assessment: Claims are the foundation for design and validation. This session […]
November 15, 2021

What Works? State Accountability Indicators to Promote Validity, Equity, and Improvement

Presentation at the AERA Special Interest Group on School Indicators and Profiles; uses examples from several states to highlight the […]
November 7, 2021

Trying to Serve Multiple Uses with Through Year Assessments

Assumptions, Claims, and the Evidence Needed to Support Them Assumptions lead to claims about the types of inferences and uses […]
September 28, 2021

Including Missing Data in the Estimate of the Impact of the Pandemic on Student Learning

Part 3: The Practical Implications of COVID-19 Learning Loss Studies It has been a year since COVID-19 made it impossible […]
March 30, 2021

Making Sense of Recent COVID-19 Impact Studies by Interim Assessment Vendors

Part 1: The Practical Implications of COVID-19 “Learning Loss” Studies It has been a year since COVID-19 made it impossible […]
March 24, 2021

Making Sense of Spring 2021 Assessment Results

The Center for Assessment produced this document to help state assessment leaders and technical advisors plan for and conduct analyses […]
March 16, 2021

Could Two Through Year Assessment Designs Provide Both Summative and Instructional Information?

An Exploration of Feasibility for a Through Year Assessment System In a past post, I showed the logical conflict that exists […]
March 2, 2021