Accountability

Accountability

Accountability systems signal policy priorities, report performance, inform support strategies, and build public understanding of K-12 schools. We work with education leaders and constituents to design, implement, and evaluate accountability systems that support student learning and school improvement. To be effective and meet states’ and districts’ goals, these systems must be technically sound and responsive to local needs.


Recent Accountability Projects

Mississippi

The Center supports the design, implementation and evaluation of Mississippi’s accountability system by providing ongoing technical consultation and analyses. We also coordinate meetings of its accountability task force, an advisory group of state education leaders. Through this work, the Center can identify solutions that are responsive to the state’s policy priorities.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire leaders wanted to learn more about whether their accountability system was working as intended. For example, are school ratings reliable, valid, and useful? The Center designed and implemented a series of studies to investigate these questions and document the results to inform the state’s ongoing efforts to refine and improve its practices.

Kentucky

Kentucky wanted to establish standards for school quality that were clear and meaningful. The Center worked closely with state leaders to develop and implement an innovative methodology for setting school performance standards. Grounding the standards in a strong process and compelling rationale helps build trust and buy-in among state constituents and helps ensure the accountability results are more useful to support school improvement.


Recent Accountability Blog Posts and Papers

2008 Reidy Interactive Lecture Series

Validating Assessment and Accountability Programs September 25th-26th Agenda Session IVicissitudes of the ValidatorsHenry Braun, Boston College Session IIModerated PanelKey considerations […]
September 26, 2008

Who Are the 2% Students and How Do We Design Test Items and Assessments? (Paper)

The modified alternate assessment option in new No Child Left Behind (NCLB) regulations allows the development and implementation of an […]
June 10, 2008

Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth

This paper situates current growth-to-standard approaches within a larger domain of statistical models, including those based solely on achievement as […]
March 20, 2008

2007 Reidy Interactive Lecture Series

English Language Learner Assessment and Accountability: Critical Considerations for Design and Implementation September 27th – 28th Agenda Session I Setting […]
September 28, 2007

Using Student Longitudinal Growth Measures for School Accountability

There are multiple ways to implement common design decisions for a growth model consistent with the underlying principles of No […]
September 18, 2006

Focusing State Educational Accountability Systems: Four Methods of Judging Quality and Progress

Dale Carlson, a member of the Center for Assessment’s board of directors, outlined a framework in this seminal 2002 paper […]
September 7, 2006

Developing a Value Table for Alaska’s Public School Performance Incentive Program

This paper outlines the process by which Alaska established the Value Table it is proposing for its school performance incentive […]
August 1, 2006

Dealing With Flexibility in Assessments for Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities

This paper analyzes and describes the flexibility or unintended variation in alternate assessments on alternate achievement standards in an effort […]
April 13, 2006

Using Value Tables for a School-Level Accountability System

A paper presented at a symposium during the 2006 NCME Annual Conference that outlines the process of using Value Tables […]
April 7, 2006

Incorporating Growth Models into AYP Determinations: NCME 2006 Growth Pre-session Materials

This workshop, associated with the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) 2006 meeting in San Francisco, was designed to […]
April 5, 2006