Accountability

Accountability

Accountability systems signal policy priorities, report performance, inform support strategies, and build public understanding of K-12 schools. We work with education leaders and constituents to design, implement, and evaluate accountability systems that support student learning and school improvement. To be effective and meet states’ and districts’ goals, these systems must be technically sound and responsive to local needs.


Recent Accountability Projects

Mississippi

The Center supports the design, implementation and evaluation of Mississippi’s accountability system by providing ongoing technical consultation and analyses. We also coordinate meetings of its accountability task force, an advisory group of state education leaders. Through this work, the Center can identify solutions that are responsive to the state’s policy priorities.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire leaders wanted to learn more about whether their accountability system was working as intended. For example, are school ratings reliable, valid, and useful? The Center designed and implemented a series of studies to investigate these questions and document the results to inform the state’s ongoing efforts to refine and improve its practices.

Kentucky

Kentucky wanted to establish standards for school quality that were clear and meaningful. The Center worked closely with state leaders to develop and implement an innovative methodology for setting school performance standards. Grounding the standards in a strong process and compelling rationale helps build trust and buy-in among state constituents and helps ensure the accountability results are more useful to support school improvement.


Recent Accountability Blog Posts and Papers

The Case for Statewide School Accountability Systems

States should continue to implement high-quality school accountability systems, regardless of the level or nature of federal oversight.
March 26, 2025

Choosing a Growth Model: Far More Than Technical Factors

Nearly all states use a measure of student growth in their accountability systems. But how should they choose a model? Our new paper provides guidance.
February 26, 2025

How Should States Choose a Growth Model?

Nearly all states use a measure of student longitudinal growth in accountability. But how should states decide which growth model to use?
February 20, 2025

Teaching & Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Focus on Student Agency

Agency—the ability to control one’s own thoughts, processes and actions—is a key skill for students to master. But assessing that mastery is challenging.
January 29, 2025

Subtraction in Assessment and Accountability (Re)Design

Resisting our urge to add design layers to assessment and accountability systems—and subtracting instead—can produce better solutions.
January 15, 2025

We’re Better Together!

Collaboration defined our work in 2024 and is at the heart of the Center’s philosophy. When we push one another to hone our ideas, we reach new heights.
December 18, 2024

Delaware Department of Education Growth Model Investigation: A Report of the Growth Model Study Group

The Delaware Department of Education's growth model study group examined the state's growth model and whether it should be replaced.
December 12, 2024

Massachusetts Accountability System Review Advisory Committee Report

The state's advisory group reviewed and discussed approaches to improve district and school accountability.
December 9, 2024

Maryland State Department of Education Assessment and Accountability Task Force Report

A summary of the assessment and accountability recommendations issued by the Maryland Assessment and Accountability Task Force.
December 3, 2024

How Do State Leaders Want to Change the Every Student Succeeds Act? 

ESSA is widely criticized, but our new survey shows that most assessment and accountability leaders favor few changes.
November 20, 2024