Accountability

Accountability

Accountability systems signal policy priorities, report performance, inform support strategies, and build public understanding of K-12 schools. We work with education leaders and constituents to design, implement, and evaluate accountability systems that support student learning and school improvement. To be effective and meet states’ and districts’ goals, these systems must be technically sound and responsive to local needs.


Recent Accountability Projects

Mississippi

The Center supports the design, implementation and evaluation of Mississippi’s accountability system by providing ongoing technical consultation and analyses. We also coordinate meetings of its accountability task force, an advisory group of state education leaders. Through this work, the Center can identify solutions that are responsive to the state’s policy priorities.

New Hampshire

New Hampshire leaders wanted to learn more about whether their accountability system was working as intended. For example, are school ratings reliable, valid, and useful? The Center designed and implemented a series of studies to investigate these questions and document the results to inform the state’s ongoing efforts to refine and improve its practices.

Kentucky

Kentucky wanted to establish standards for school quality that were clear and meaningful. The Center worked closely with state leaders to develop and implement an innovative methodology for setting school performance standards. Grounding the standards in a strong process and compelling rationale helps build trust and buy-in among state constituents and helps ensure the accountability results are more useful to support school improvement.


Recent Accountability Blog Posts and Papers

Strengthening Ties Between Accountability and School Improvement

Do school accountability systems support effective school improvement practices? If not, where is the system breaking down and how can we fix it?
May 1, 2024

What We’re Up To: Center Presentations at NCME and AERA

Our associates are giving many fascinating presentations at the assessment field’s two big spring conferences, NCME and AERA. Here’s a quick rundown.
April 4, 2024

You Can Get the Accountability System You Want (Part 2)

States complain that ESSA bars them from getting the accountability systems they really want. We present three examples of systems that show otherwise.
March 13, 2024

Issues That Loom Large for K-12 Assessment and Accountability:

2023 was a busy year for assessment and accountability. Scott Marion recaps the year’s key issues and looks ahead to questions that loom large for 2024.
January 10, 2024

Threats to the Validity of Accountability Systems, Part 3:

In this three-part series, we explore key aspects of system design that need to be properly balanced. In this last post, we explore formative vs. summative feedback.
December 20, 2023

Threats to the Validity of Accountability Systems, Part 2:  

In this three-part series, we explore key aspects of school accountability design that need to be properly balanced. In Part 2, we examine precision vs. actionability.
December 13, 2023

Threats to the Validity of Accountability Systems, Part 1:

In this three-part series, we explore key aspects of school accountability design that need to be properly balanced. In Part 1, we examine simplicity vs. complexity.
December 6, 2023

You Can Get the Accountability System You Want (Part 1)

States can have the school accountability systems they value by minimizing the footprint of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
November 15, 2023

2023 Reidy Interactive Lecture Series

Reflecting on and Improving Accountability Systems: Promises and Challenges Agenda Thursday, September 21st TimeTopic9:00amWelcome and Introduction to RILSScott Marion, Center […]
September 21, 2023

Improving Accountability Through Authentic Community Engagement

Systems work best when they’re shaped by authentic input from the people they serve, but states and districts make key mistakes in gathering feedback.
September 20, 2023