
Subtraction in Assessment and Accountability (Re)Design
Resisting our urge to add design layers to assessment and accountability systems—and subtracting instead—can produce better solutions.
Read MoreResisting our urge to add design layers to assessment and accountability systems—and subtracting instead—can produce better solutions.
Read MoreStates can create an accountability mix that right-sizes federal requirements and their own priorities, by blending or separating the two.
Read MoreESSA is widely criticized, but our new survey shows that most assessment and accountability leaders favor few changes.
Read MoreFew states evaluate their systems to see if they’re working well. We examined one state’s consistency in identifying the right schools for support.
Read MoreShifting from an accountability mindset to reciprocal responsibility could transform the way schools, districts and states work toward improvement.
Read MoreAn important new book from the National Academy of Education can support state and district leaders in building balanced assessment systems.
Read MoreThrough-year and other novel test designs face challenges in peer review. Three changes by the U.S. Department of Education could improve the process.
Read MoreWe can reduce testing in schools without sacrificing meaningful annual reports on students’ learning.
Read MoreState testing has long been criticized for many reasons. We undertook a study to examine what tradeoffs might be necessary to reduce the footprint of state testing. Here’s a preview of our early findings.
Read MoreIn a bid to jump-start the program, USED expands the IADA. Nearly $22 million is potentially available to support work on new state assessments.
Read MoreIt’s time to create school accountability systems that recognize the unique roles and responsibilities of states, districts and schools.
Read MoreAfter Georgia pulled out of a federal assessment pilot, the state’s testing chief reflects on the policy changes necessary to support real test improvement.
Read MoreWe don’t refute calls for more sweeping reform, but we must take swift action to make school accountability work better right now.
Read MoreStates must reconsider their content standards, assessments, and testing practices to keep up with two important trends in college- and career-readiness.
Read MoreFederal regulations limit states’ innovations in assessment. More substantial innovation can happen only with more flexibility in accountability.
Read MoreAdvancing educational assessment, like through-year assessment programs, can be supported by changes to the RFP process.
Read MoreLet’s start talking about student learning recovery and stop focusing on the impact of remote instruction during the pandemic.
Read MoreMeasuring post-COVID student learning recovery with large-scale assessment draws focus on how we make sense of test scores.
Read More