What Do We Know About Innovative Assessment?
Are states creating tests that are truly innovative? To answer that, we took a look at the characteristics, process and purposes of innovation.
Read MoreAre states creating tests that are truly innovative? To answer that, we took a look at the characteristics, process and purposes of innovation.
Read MoreShifting from an accountability mindset to reciprocal responsibility could transform the way schools, districts and states work toward improvement.
Read MoreBefore launching a project to build an “innovative” assessment for education, it’s wise to define what you want to move toward—and away from.
Read MoreGoogle’s recent release of Gemini showcases AI’s potential to reshape educational assessment. We must be open to these changes, while monitoring and managing their risks.
Read MoreWe can reduce testing in schools without sacrificing meaningful annual reports on students’ learning.
Read MoreState testing has long been criticized for many reasons. We undertook a study to examine what tradeoffs might be necessary to reduce the footprint of state testing. Here’s a preview of our early findings.
Read MoreIt’s time to create school accountability systems that recognize the unique roles and responsibilities of states, districts and schools.
Read MoreThe federal innovative assessment pilot has hobbled the testing improvements it aimed to promote. We can change that by rethinking test comparability.
Read MoreThose who promote using performance assessment for accountability may want to stop and consider exactly what they want to argue for.
Read MoreAn assessment’s negative or positive consequences are just as important as other dimensions of assessment quality, and should be part of test validity evaluations.
Read MoreAdvances in artificial intelligence are transforming assessment and accountability. We explore the risks and opportunities of AI in 10 areas of K-12 work.
Read MoreFederal regulations limit states’ innovations in assessment. More substantial innovation can happen only with more flexibility in accountability.
Read MoreScience, technology, and the arts (STEAM) combine to provide exceptional educational value and innovation to students.
Read MoreMaking the Case for a New Approach to Federal School Accountability The U.S. Department of Education followed an all too familiar pattern of publishing important guidance just before the Christmas […]
Read MoreThoughts on What Has Worked Well, What Has Been Less Successful, and Why This post is based on Charlie DePascale’s presentation during Session 1 of the virtual 2021 Reidy Interactive […]
Read MoreDiscussions with State Leaders Approved to Implement Innovative Assessment Demonstration Authority Pilots Five states have been approved to implement innovative assessment pilots as part of the Innovative Assessment Demonstration Authority (IADA) under […]
Read MoreGame-Based Assessment Can be Fun for Students: Can We Make Its Use More Informative for Teachers? This is the fifth post by one of our 2021 summer interns based on their project […]
Read MoreHouston, I Think We Might Have a Problem One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and yet expecting different results. Recently, I have been […]
Read More